Nemo Tenetur Seipsum Accusare Law and Legal Definition
Nemo tenetur seipsum accusare is a legal maxim in Latin. It states that no one is bound to incriminate or accuse himself.
The following is an example of a case law referring to the maxim:
"The maxim nemo tenetur seipsum accusare had its origin in a protest against the inquisitorial and manifestly unjust methods of interrogating accused persons, which [have] long obtained in the continental system, and, until the expulsion of the Stuarts from the British throne in 1688, and the erection of additional barriers for the protection of the people against the exercise of arbitrary power, [were] not uncommon even in England. While the admissions or confessions of the prisoner, when voluntarily and freely made, have always ranked high in the scale of incriminating evidence, if an accused person be asked to explain his apparent connection with a crime under investigation, the ease with which the questions put to him may assume an inquisitorial character, the temptation to press the witness unduly, to browbeat him if he be timid or reluctant, to push him into a corner, and to entrap him into fatal contradictions, which is so painfully evident in many of the earlier state trials, notably in those of Sir Nicholas Throckmorton, and Udal, the Puritan minister, made the system so odious as to give rise to a demand for its total abolition. The change in the English criminal procedure in that particular seems to be founded upon no statute and no judicial opinion, but upon a general and silent acquiescence of the courts in a popular demand. But, however adopted, it has become firmly embedded in English, as well as in American jurisprudence. So deeply did the iniquities of the ancient system impress themselves upon the minds of the American colonists that the States, with one accord, made a denial of the right to question an accused person a part of their fundamental law, so that a maxim, which in England was a mere rule of evidence, became clothed in this country with the impregnability of a constitutional enactment."[ Miranda v. Ariz., 384 U.S. 436, 442-443 (U.S. 1966)].
Legal Definition list
Related Legal Terms
- Accusare Nemo Se Debet Nisi Coram Deo
- Cogitationis Poenam Nemo Patitur
- Majus Est Delictum Seipsum Occidere Quam Alium
- Minor Tenetur In Quantum Locupletior Factus
- Nemo Ad Littus Maris Accedere Prohibetur
- Nemo Allegans Suam Tupitudinem Audiendus Est
- Nemo Cogi Potest Praecise Ad Factum, Sed In Id Tantum Quod Interest
- Nemo Contra Factum Suum Venire Potest
- Nemo Dat Quod Non Habet
- Nemo Debet Bis Vexari Si Constat Curiae Quod Sit Pro Una Et Eadem Causa